[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Fwd: svn 1.5.1 merge clue required]

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:47:56 -0400

Lawrence Stewart <lstewart_at_room52.net> writes:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
>>>> I haven't had any nibbles from the users@ mailing list so I'm hoping
>>>> someone here might have some thoughts...
>>> Note for the future: dev@ is *not* part of some grand escalation policy of
>>> users@.
>> :-) A more detailed explanation of that may be found here:
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/mailing-lists.html#where
>> [deliberately not CC'ing dev@ on this, I've posted it there before]

Hey, Lawrence (and everybody),

It's my fault, not Lawrence's, that his reply here got posted to the
list. My private mail to him still had a "Mail-followup-to:" header
pointing to the list (long story).

> Duly noted. I have followed both lists for some time and was aware of
> the separate list charters. In my (perhaps misguided) defence, I would
> not have forwarded my query on to dev@ unless I had strong reason to
> believe the behaviour I was observing was indicative of a bug in svn
> or the documentation. In retrospect, I can see that a direct forward
> of my email from users@ to dev@ was inappropriate, as the subject and
> phrasing of that email was targeted at the users@ audience.

Ah, okay. Thanks for your understanding; rethreading in bug-report form
is welcome of course.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-11 17:48:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.