Re: Useless explicit mergeinfo records

> We toyed with this, but the problem (or one of the problems) we ran into was
> what happened if you performed a copy (perhaps to make a local branch), then
> tried to merge into it. The merge needs that mergeinfo as much as commit
> might. And maybe the answer there that 'merge' also grows the ability to
> detect stale-and-in-need-of-network-refreshing mergeinfo on working copy
> members, and does said refreshing before performing its primary task. I dunno.

We have some other ideas how to fix this. I've just posted the
corresponding patch at
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-09/0331.shtml

Looking forward for your comments.

--
Danil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org