[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Lost patches/bug reports (Was: Re: Merge handles svn:eol-style wrongly)

From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel_at_users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:12:56 +0200

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:04:51PM -0700, David Glasser wrote:
> I found a couple problems like this months ago, and committed at least
> one fix; other patches languished unreviewed. Let me see if I can dig
> them up.

Maybe the bug tracking system should be used more intensivly? I'm sure
that many bugs are lost because they where reported only on a list or
because of the warning in the tracker to contact a list first.

I would also like to get more info to the changelog. A issue number
would allow me to follow the discussion, that's harder for revisions.

Are duplicates really so problematical? Eclipse's one contains hundred
of thousands bugs but my bugs are fixed nevertheless in short time at a
rate of at least 80% (others are probably just lost in the huge amount).

Debian's system has also no big hurdles.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-05 12:24:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.