[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] Issue 2269 - svn st|up Do Not Warn When Ran Against a Nonexistent Path

From: Jeremy Whitlock <jcscoobyrs_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:01:16 -0600

> In principle, we could have made Subversion treat those cases as an
> error. However, until now it has treated both of these cases as
> enquiring about an item that might (later) exist at that path, and I
> don't think we can change that now without making quite a few users
> unhappy.

So how should we handle this? Is this issue now a moot point, since
it existed so long and people might have gotten use to this
functionality? I don't mind either way. On one hand, I can see these
being errors but maybe they aren't.

Take care,
Jeremy Whitlock
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-27 17:01:29 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.