Re: Tree-conflicts branch - log message / review
From: Stephen Butler <sbutler_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:32:06 +0200
Quoting Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>:
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:58 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
[...]
>> * subversion/svn/schema/status.rnc
There's a UI design issue here, due to a lack of space in the user
There is a priority for use of that first column, in the case that
I think a tree conflict should have a higher priority than added et al.,
Also, we need to choose a letter. T and C are already in use. How
With per-victim flags, the output of the update, switch, merge, info
(I'll add a few comments about tests, too, in another mail.)
Regards,
-- Stephen Butler | Software Developer elego Software Solutions GmbH Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25 | 13355 Berlin | Germany fon: +49 30 2345 8696 | mobile: +49 163 25 45 015 fax: +49 30 2345 8695 | http://www.elegosoft.com Geschäftsführer: Olaf Wagner | Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 77719 | USt-IdNr: DE163214194 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.orgReceived on 2008-08-20 17:32:23 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.