Re: Relativeness of path arguments in libsvn_wc.

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
> Many of the path arguments in libsvn_wc predate the adm_access system
> altogether. Most (if not all) of the time, they may be either absolute or
> relative (to $CWD), depending on what the client library provided.
> Sometimes they are duplicates of the paths in the associated access_batons
> (and hence unnecessary).
>
> Are they ever *relative to* the access_baton path? Perhaps sometimes --
> this is the one case (of those listed) which deserves explicit documentation
> in the docstrings.

I've documented this in r32552, thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-19 16:38:50 CEST