Re: [RFC] Mark deprecated functions with SVN_DEPRECATED / __attribute__((deprecated))

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:
>...
>> What
>> is the problem with one header?
>
> The problem with one header is it will (in the limit) refer to every
> type defined in all Subversion libraries: a big monolithic lump that

Gah! Yeah, you're right.

Alrighty... well, let's at least get the SVN_DEPRECATED into the
declarations. That's pretty cool.

Solving the type issues... urgh.

An intermediate easy solution: move all deprecated declarations to the
*bottom* of the header file. Anybody have an issue with that?

I'm okay with an svn_deprecated.h that contains as many deprecated
functions as possible, but leaves behind things that need special
types. It is a bit messier since some deprecated things will remain,
and some will move. But that doesn't really bother me. Thoughts?

Cheers,
-g

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-19 15:11:56 CEST