[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: To Greg Stein

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:41:49 -0700

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 at 08:05 -0700:
>> As I've been poring over svn_wc.h, I've been thinking that we need
>> svn_deprecated.h and move all of the function signatures and types
>> into that file. Let them all sit there, undocumented ("want doc? look
> I like having the diff'ed doc-strings [1] available, using them is
> easier than reading doc-strings on two branches and doing a mental diff.
> In other words, I think the doc-strings are useful :)

Agreed. But I'm talking about the *deprecated* functions. Why do they
need docstrings?

"We don't want you using these functions, so we're not going to document them."


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-18 21:42:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.