Re: tree-conflicts: patch for improved cmdline tests
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:22:11 +0200
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 02:36:48PM +0200, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
Hey Neels,
note that there's also XFail(), which can be used to mark
In this case, almost every test would need to be flagged XFail.
The net result is the same.
But I assume that we don't really know yet what the desired
> 2) One by one, look at the undesirable results and fix them in subsequent
Maybe make that 3 steps?
1) Have tons of tests that PASS the current state of things (this patch)
for test in tests:
> So, as mentioned, this patch passes the current situation on the
That is bad.
Steve and Julian, could one of you take a look at this?
> I would like this patch to be committed on the tree-conflicts branch, so
I'll leave that to Steve and Julian as well, as I'm bound up
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.