Re: In which situation will a deleted item be scheduled add/replace?

"Rui, Guo" <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:59:30PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
>> That looks like a bug.
>>
>> svnadmin create repo
>> svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
>> touch wc/foo wc/bar
>> svn add wc/foo wc/bar
>> svn ci -mm wc
>> svn up wc
>> svn rm wc/foo
>> svn ci -mm wc # foo is entry->deleted
>> svn cp wc/bar wc/foo # BUG! foo is not entry->deleted
>> svn revert wc/foo
>> svn up -r1 wc
> And if you try without '-r1' instead, the update will simply fail.

Is that because revert leaves an unversioned wc/foo? I forgot to show
'rm wc/foo' after the revert; it's possible that that is a revert bug
and that the copy should not count as a local modification.

>>
>> The last update should restore wc/foo but the copy bug means it
>> doesn't happen.
>
> Does this bug deserve a fix? It seems not very harmful.

I'd say yes, but I'm not planning to do it :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-16 11:09:39 CEST