Re: Releasing 1.6

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Yes, this is a concern of mine, too. Traditionally we keep open the
> maintenance of two minor release streams at a time. IMO, 1.5.x would have
> been far too short-lived to drop 1.4.x from the maintenance window. Of
> course, we can always choose to maintain three lines instead of two, here.

I think that releasing 1.6.x with whatever feature is needed in a
shorter timeframe makes more sense than having to invent new
versioning schemes because a third-party wants to issue binaries that
claim to be Subversion 1.5.x, but do not correspond to any of our
mainline releases. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-07 15:18:35 CEST