Re: Reverse merges and log -g

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, I'm convinced that showing reverse merges is the right thing to
> do. Putting aside the question of whether revisions resulting from
> reverse merges should be flagged, there is still the problem of some
> reverse merges not showing up (see
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235#desc7).

http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235#desc8
                                                            ^^^

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-22 16:12:54 CEST