Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Blair Zajac wrote:
>> stylesen_at_tigris.org wrote:
>>> Author: stylesen
>>> Date: Wed Jul 16 01:04:25 2008
>>> New Revision: 32135
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Obvious fix.
>>>
>>> * tools/dev/check-license.py
>>> (NEW_LICENSE): s/2005/2008/
>>
>> That's not an obvious fix, the last change to that file was in 2005,
>> so I don't think we can just bump the year to 2008. Before bumping
>> copyright years I always check the log to see if there are any
>> significant changes.
>
> Should I need to revert this commit? I thought it was obvious fix, since
> it may help in adding new license with latest year as 2008 :(
It should be reverted. Also, for blank years, it looks like we would use
2005,2008 if there were significant changes in 2008.
On IRC:
<blairzajac> what's the policy on bumping copyright dates? we only do so for
significant changes to the file and do we do 2005,2008 or 2005-2008 even if
there were no changes in 2006 and 2007?
<cmpilato> blairzajac: only for significant changes, yes. but i don't think we
leave gaps.
* cmpilato may not be remembering correctly, though.
<Arfrever> blairzajac: Rather 2005,2008.
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-16 21:17:09 CEST