[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Behavior of svn remove on sparse directory.

From: Rui, Guo <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:27:08 +0800

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:21:09PM -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
> "Rui, Guo" <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn> writes:
> > Annoying? But yes, no data is actually lost. And I don't think this
> > will become a widespread problem, since this is not a typical use case
> > to remove a large sparse tree. So, maybe you are right. Just leave
> > things intact right now and wait for the user feedback.
>
> Yes. Interface conservatism, basically :-).
>
> By the way, Guo Rui, I have seen your recent commits. I'm still plowing
> through issue #2489, but you're next on my list.
Never mind. But, please take sometime to fill in the mid term evaluation of
gsoc if you have not done it yet. According to the timelime, this should be
done before 14th.

Rui

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-11 18:27:23 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.