Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2008-07-09 17:03:51 Hyrum K. Wright napisał(a):
>> arfrever_at_tigris.org wrote:
>>> Author: arfrever
>>> Date: Tue Jul 8 14:57:35 2008
>>> New Revision: 32042
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> * STATUS: Nominate r32017, r32029 and vote for r31964.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> branches/1.5.x/STATUS
>>>
>>> Modified: branches/1.5.x/STATUS
>>> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.5.x/STATUS?pathrev=32042&r1=32041&r2=32042
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- branches/1.5.x/STATUS Tue Jul 8 14:45:29 2008 (r32041)
>>> +++ branches/1.5.x/STATUS Tue Jul 8 14:57:35 2008 (r32042)
>>> @@ -127,5 +126,10 @@ Candidate changes for 1.5.1:
>>> Votes:
>>> +1: dlr
>>>
>>> + * r32017, r32029
>>> + Support Berkeley DB 4.7.
>>> + Votes:
>>> + +1: arfrever
>>> +
>>> Approved changes:
>>> =================
>>>
>> Is this a bugfix or a feature? I know that we occasionally bump
>> accepted patch releases of our various dependencies in patch releases of
>> our own, but I'm a little wary about this one. I doubt many people have
>> an immediate need for 4.7 support, anyway. I haven't reviewed the
>> changes in question, though, and they may prove to be less intrusive
>> than I think.
>
> Without r32017+r32029 Subversion would still build when Berkeley DB 4.7 is
> used, but support for the Berkeley DB logging subsystem would be disabled.
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/upgrade.4.7/log.html
In other words, we would *silently* lose support for a *very* important
subsystem!
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2008-07-09 21:54:04 CEST