[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r32042 - branches/1.5.x

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:03:51 -0700

arfrever_at_tigris.org wrote:
> Author: arfrever
> Date: Tue Jul 8 14:57:35 2008
> New Revision: 32042
>
> Log:
> * STATUS: Nominate r32017, r32029 and vote for r31964.
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.5.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: branches/1.5.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.5.x/STATUS?pathrev=32042&r1=32041&r2=32042
> ==============================================================================
> --- branches/1.5.x/STATUS Tue Jul 8 14:45:29 2008 (r32041)
> +++ branches/1.5.x/STATUS Tue Jul 8 14:57:35 2008 (r32042)
> @@ -127,5 +126,10 @@ Candidate changes for 1.5.1:
> Votes:
> +1: dlr
>
> + * r32017, r32029
> + Support Berkeley DB 4.7.
> + Votes:
> + +1: arfrever
> +
> Approved changes:
> =================
>

Is this a bugfix or a feature? I know that we occasionally bump
accepted patch releases of our various dependencies in patch releases of
our own, but I'm a little wary about this one. I doubt many people have
  an immediate need for 4.7 support, anyway. I haven't reviewed the
changes in question, though, and they may prove to be less intrusive
than I think.

More generally, can we start adding the "Justification" field to our
nominations again? We've been a bit lax about that in 1.5.x. (I'm not
picking on Arfrever in particular here, we've all been guilty.)

-Hyrum

Received on 2008-07-09 17:04:14 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.