Karl Fogel wrote on Sat, 5 Jul 2008 at 19:15 -0400:
> Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.co.il> writes:
> >> Thus, for "foo_at_BASE":
> >>
> >> 0. Resolve "BASE" to an actual revision number (easy to do locally)
> >
> > By looking at the current revision of 'foo' (which may differ from the
> > current revision of its parent); e.g.,
> >
> > % svn co -r50 $URL wc -q
> > % svn up -r51 wc/iota
> > R iota
> > % svn cat iota_at_BASE
> >
> > currently resolves BASE to r51 (not to r50).
>
> Sure. (Is that controversial? Your followup just points it out, but
> I'm not sure if that means you thought it was an unexpected fact...)
>
It isn't controversial, I just wanted to clarify this point in your
algorithm. After all, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume that, since
"foo_at_PEG" is a path relative to ".", its interpretation might depend on
"."'s revision. (You just said that this isn't the case.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-06 07:49:20 CEST