Re: svn commit: r31724 - branches/issue-2843-dev/subversion/libsvn_wc

"Rui, Guo" <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn> writes:
>> I'm not sure I understand how to connect the first sentence in that
>> comment with the second sentence.
>
> Well, I try to explain it in another way. If we report the TARGET itself as
> excluded the server will send us nothing about the TARGET, right?
>
> I just want 'svn up A' always works, no matter whether the wc root is in
> svn_depth_empty/files or the target A was explicitly excluded while the wc
> root is in svn_depth_immediates/infinity and we want it back now.

Thank you, yes. I've redone the comment in r31917, taking hints from
your explanation above.

(There's another mail from you waiting in my inbox, and I think it
explains how there may be a bug in the code there. I just wanted to get
the comment clarification in before looking at the potential bug. One
thing at a time.)

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-30 03:50:15 CEST