"Mark Phippard" <markphip_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> Yes, this is expected. Properties are not designed for storing huge
>> values. There is no enforced limit on the size of a property, but the
>> performance is poor when they are large.
>>
>> I can't find any reference to this in the book (or FAQ), though.
>
> The original poster implies this is a 1.5-regression. He does not say
> it outright. That would be the first thing I would want to know. I
> had the same initial thought as you, but we need to know if it worked
> the same with previous releases or not.
I would be very, very surprised if the behavior were different in any
previous release. Properties were never designed to hold such large
values (we should document that fact better, though).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-20 16:35:01 CEST