Re: [RFC] Replacement for "assert" in the libraries

On 2008-06-17 19:13:22 -0700, David Glasser wrote:
> Doesn't help. (Return types.)

Hmm... I forgot the return. Now, even without considering assertions,
there's a problem: how does Subversion's standard error reporting
mechanism can work with void functions?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org