[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] Replacement for "assert" in the libraries

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:16:12 -0700

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, David Glasser
<glasser_at_davidglasser.net> wrote:
> Additionally, assert/abort generally gives good stack traces
> when run in gdb, whereas it's trickier to track down the source of our
> error objects.

Hmm, nobody's really responded to this point of mine. Am I seriously
the only person who appreciates how assert/abort works better with gdb
than our errors?

Or to the point: does everybody else have some special trick for
getting the breakpoint at the right place with svn_error_t in gdb that
I don't know about?


David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-17 23:16:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.