Re: [RFC] Replacement for "assert" in the libraries

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, David Glasser
<glasser_at_davidglasser.net> wrote:
> Additionally, assert/abort generally gives good stack traces
> when run in gdb, whereas it's trickier to track down the source of our
> error objects.

Hmm, nobody's really responded to this point of mine. Am I seriously
the only person who appreciates how assert/abort works better with gdb
than our errors?

Or to the point: does everybody else have some special trick for
getting the breakpoint at the right place with svn_error_t in gdb that
I don't know about?

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org