[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: merge very slow

From: Jens Peters <jpeters7677_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:59:19 +0200

Stefan Küng wrote:
> Seems I have to patch neon in my build to get the speed up to par with
> a VC6 build.
> Stefan

Oh men, the bottleneck on my system was not svn but my firewall on my
somewhat older server machine. I do use Kerio Winroute firewall with
some very safe, but apparently slow settings ;).

Now I have similar timings:

VC 2008, x64 release:
unpatched neon: 4:16
patched neon (As you wrote on svn dev list): 2:04

VC6 (rc9 from collab.net)

Thus, case more or less solved (congrats!), at least about the
differences between VC6 and VC2008.

With my very limited c knowledge I would say the pre-proc. directive is
not correct.

#if defined(TCP_NODELAY) && defined(HAVE_SETSOCKOPT) && defined(IPPROTO_TCP)

if stated like above even the VS syntax highlighting says that the
condition is false. If stated like:
#if defined(TCP_NODELAY) && defined(HAVE_SETSOCKOPT) //&&

then its true (according to VS). So it seems that defined does not like
enum values directly. (But i guess you already know that ;))


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-15 19:59:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.