[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: merge very slow

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:48:44 +0200

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've noticed that a merge done with a client built with VS2008 is twice as
>> slow as a client built with VC6. Has anyone here noticed that too?
>> I've described my efforts to solve this problem here:
>> http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=34103
>> If anyone has any idea what could cause this, I'd really appreciate any
>> help.
> Is there any way to profile it? I see the times in the packets was
> different, do you think the problem is in the networking layer? I had
> been debating switching our CollabNet builds to using VS 2008. I
> guess I'll hold off on that.
> You are using the same APR? I believe we are using 1.2.12 and Neon 0.28.2.
> Have you tried using any different servers or protocols?

Update: I've tried a big merge with svn:// on a test repository running
svnserve on my local machine. The RC9 from open.collab.net timed this at
4.5 seconds, my build timed it at 13 seconds.
So it's the very same with svn:// than with http://

I can't see a difference when using file:///, but that may simply be
because it's much much faster anyway.


   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net

Received on 2008-06-14 18:49:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.