Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm currently thinking of using venti instead of the filesystem
> as storage backend. For those who dont know it yet:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venti
>
> My idea is to take the fsfs backend as template and change it
> that way:
>
> * some table list holds an mapping between mappings of the
> revision-IDs and venti keys.
> * for reading, the venti key for some revision is fetched from
> that table and the file is downloaded from venti into a local
> cache.
> * on commit, the new revision file is uploaded to venti and the
> returned key added to the table.
>
> Everything else, IMHO, should remain the same.
> (ah, perhaps the same w/ the revrops files)
>
>
> What do you think about that approach ?
What problems are you trying to solve with venti?
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-13 18:46:11 CEST