[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC,PATCH] Port libsvn_auth_kwallet to KDE3.

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:12:39 -0400

Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> writes:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com> writes:
>>> Er, I just want to remind everyone of something:
>>> There is no such thing as a "veto" in Subversion.
>> I never used word "veto" :)
> Oh, I know. However, other people were confused about what might be
> possible here -- I was addressing them. No worries.

Sorry, I meant: I was addressing them as well as you, as there has
sometimes been confusion over what "-1" means and whether it's the same
as what "veto" means in other projects.

In any case, everyone is now aware that there are no unilateral
decision-making processes in Subversion, which is the main point.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-11 22:13:07 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.