Re: 1.5.x vs tarball, differences in test counts

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> When I run 'make check' from my 1.5.x wc, I get:
>>> Running all tests in client-test [1/61]...success
>>> Running all tests in compat-test [2/61]...success
>>> Running all tests in config-test [3/61]...success
>>> ...
>>>
>>> When I run the same command from an rc11 tarball, I get:
>>> Running all tests in client-test [1/56]...success
>>> Running all tests in compat-test [2/56]...success
>>> Running all tests in config-test [3/56]...success
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Why is it that the tarball only has 56 tests and my working copy has
>>> 61? Is there something I'm missing here, or are we actually losing
>>> tests somewhere?
>>>
>>> -Hyrum
>>>
>> With the same ra layer and fs type??
>
> Yep, just 'make check' on both systems. Though, my rc11 environment
> doesn't build the bdb backend. Would that reduce the number of tests?

It would eliminate fs-base-test, skel-test, key-test, strings-reps-test, and
changes-test. (Which is your difference of five tests.)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org