Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 21:10 +0200, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>
>>>> You obviously meant:
>>>> 3. A regression test, as this issue is important enough to hold off
>>>> the 10th RC and almost caused a regression.
>>>>
>>>> Lieven - always prepared to provide test writing cycles.
>>>>
>>> The fix is in -- feel free to start your test composition now.
>>>
>>>
>> r31688. This one wasn't actually that hard, at least not compared to
>> some of the merge tests.
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
> (Do we need to back-port tests? You mentioned doing so in IRC, but tests
> are not in themselves critical to making the branch suitable for
> release.)
>
>
Normally we should. Having the test only on trunk is not really useful,
as the test might pass on trunk but still fail on the branch. I normally
add the test to the group of revisions for the fix, but here the fix was
approved before I could add it, so I'll just add the test revision
separately.
Lieven
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-10 21:53:48 CEST