[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.5.0-rc8 up for signing/testing

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 20:33:45 -0400

Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> writes:
> "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> writes:
>> http://test.hyrumwright.org/svn/1.5.0-rc8/
> Summary:
> All good (but see "Caveat" below).
> Caveat:
> See http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=139336
> (Message-ID: <874p8hleq0.fsf_-__at_red-bean.com>). That thread discusses
> a bug that may or may not be serious enough to affect this release.
> (I still haven't set things up to test new client against old servers
> and vice versa; that's clearly needed, as the above thread proves.)

Note that that thread continues...

   From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
   To: dev_at_subversion.tigris.org
   Subject: Re: Possible data corruption issue?
   Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 19:41:17 -0400
   Message-ID: <87k5ha3uua.fsf_at_red-bean.com>

...and touches on whether or not an RC9 is needed. The above message
expresses the opinion that RC9 may *not* be needed. However, others may
follow up with different thoughts. To avoid thread duplication, let's
keep the discussion over there; and that's what I'm trying to do by
pointing to it from this email :-).


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-01 02:34:25 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.