[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Yet more DAV bugs

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:24:03 -0700

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:08 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> You think? You know we don't use ne_propfind*, right?

I don't know why you have such an antagonistic tone.

Of course I know that. The catch is that it's not just ne_propfind*
that triggers PROPFIND.

You can implement a cache, but I don't expect it to be an hour's worth
of work and get 100% efficiency. You might be able to cut out a
reasonably good chunk, but I don't expect that you will catch all of
the uses - to do so, you'll very likely need to dive into neon itself.

I fail to see the point if ra_serf already offers the functionality
anyway...but I have no desire in stopping you if you wish to go down
that rabbit hole. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-28 22:24:18 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.