Re: 1.5.0-rc7 up for signing/testing

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Your impression is wrong in a couple of ways. First, FSFS is not
> experimental -- it is the default backend store for Subversion, and
> there's no way we'd make an experimental filesystem implementation the
> default. Second, ra_serf isn't even up to par with ra_neon in the way
> that FSFS is with BDB. A bug in ra_serf is not allowed to forcibly stop
> our release process (though we may *choose* to halt it in order to fix
> ra_serf if we wish).
>

ah, sorry. I meant it the other way around. I know of course that fsfs is fully stable and the default backend since several releases. I thought that
ra_serf has reached a similar stability by now, thus is ready for production usage. I got that expression because I never saw a warning that I'm about
to build any experimental component into subversion and because everyone is including ra_serf tests during the release procedure of a release candidate.

But I got the point that this is not the case :) , sorry for the noise. (and of course thank you for your time and answer).

Regards,
Jens

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-28 20:21:28 CEST