Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> First of all we don't have a fix yet. Well, the changes I made to fix
> those two authz tests broke some other tests :(
>
> Ideally we do not ship code with known errors. The reasons I'm ok with
> postponing this particular fix to 1.5.1 are mainly because it's about
> time we get 1.5.0 released, and the issue only shows up in ra_serf, an
> expiremental module which failed those tests in 1.4 too.
Thanks for your answer. Ok, I understand. Actually, how experimental is
ra_serf? I got the impression that it has a similar status as FSFS
compared to BDB? I never saw a warning during configure (or make_gen in
my case) that I'm about to include experimental stuff...
>> I'm currently rerunning the suite on Win32 with VS2005SP1. I had a
>> bdb failure with rc5 as well. See
>> (http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-05/0166.shtml).
>
> But that's BDB, that's different as BDB is 'supported'.
>
It would be cool if that issue is resolved. But as far as I monitored
the mailing list it is a more or less 'accepted' failure as well (:
regards,
jens
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-28 09:10:21 CEST