"Troy Curtis Jr" <troycurtisjr_at_gmail.com> writes:
> I interpret his question as this: Is it possible that the pool the
> returned array is in can be destroyed sometime after the dll
> containing the static string is unloaded, and that a caller might try
> to access the static string location after the dll is unloaded but
> before the pool is destroyed.
>
> I still think the answer is likely that it doesn't matter, but I don't
> know the details of the subversion dll loading/unloading procedures.
I don't understand this line of questioning at all, I have to admit.
What does the static string have to do with anything pool-related? Why
is the static string even coming up as an issue in the same sentence
with "pool"? :-) It's not allocated in the pool. It has nothing to do
with the pool. We could allocate and destroy pools all day long and it
would never affect that static string in the slightest...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-27 17:39:12 CEST