[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: issue #1796

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 17:37:03 -0400

Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> writes:
> Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
>> The difference is that svn_utf__is_valid() returns a boolean, where
>> check_utf8 returns a SVN_ERROR. Both of these functions are only
>> accessible within libsvn_subr, and are neither in include/ nor in
>> include/private.
>> Any opinions on which one of these functions should be published (and
>> where)?
> svn_utf_is_valid is already exported from the shared libs (it's not
> declared staic, and we don't do any magic exports). Declare that in a
> new header, e.g., include/private/utf.h.

I think you meant "svn_utf__is_valid", and +1.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-26 23:37:21 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.