On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, the tests were all looking good for me. All the bindings tests
> passed and I had gotten through all the ra_local. Earlier I had run
> serf and neon. But then on my Windows box I accidentally stumbled on
> a bug I created in JavaHL. I am creating a fix now that I will
> propose for backport.
>
> There is another thread about that.
>
> Quick summary: We made a change to JavaHL last week to synch it with
> other API changes. When you run svn log in JavaHL, you now get back
> all of the revprops in a Map. Where as we used to get author, date
> and message as explicit fields. Anyway, we added a class to parse the
> svn:date string into a Java date. The bug was that the parsing code
> was assuming the date was in the current timezone, and I believe it is
> actually in UTC timezone. No one has actually confirmed that for me,
> and if it is not true, then only the test that is failing is wrong. I
> am going to commit code that assumes the date is in UTC as that is
> what it looks like when I am testing it.
I committed and nominated this for backport. Once I used the log API
from Subclipse this bug also became very obvious. All the Subversion
commit activity had a time that was 4 hours into the future. With
this patch applied the dates are right.
Sorry to screw up the RC6, but hopefully not many people had started testing it.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-25 02:07:02 CEST