[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Possible bad (incorrect) JavaHL test inserted into 1.5.x

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 19:26:30 -0400

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:

>> Since the revprops are coming in a Map, it makes sense that they are
>> consistently all the same type of object, in which case it needs to be
>> a String. I also agree with Hyrum that it makes sense to do as much
>> logic in Java as we can.
> Not when it adds to the overhead of understanding what the code does.

What are you referring to? The revprop Map? I think Hyrum did a
pretty good job explaining why it should be the way it is. I also do
not think it makes sense for every object in the Map to be a string,
except for the svn:date which users are supposed to know is some other
kind of object. It also precludes us from ever using generics.

Are Subversion dates always in UTC? That is what I think the problem is.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-25 01:26:43 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.