Re: Question on JavaHL change

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> The LogDate idea is a good solution. Do we think we can get it
>> implemented in time for the release? If not, I still think we should
>> just back out these changes and do this in 1.6.
>
> I have attached a patch which adds a LogDate class and uses it in
> SVNClient. The C++ would need to be changed to store a LogDate object
> in the Map for the svn:date entry.

Attaching a second patch. This adds a test case for the LogDate
class. This patch just includes the test.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org