[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 1.5 Release decision?

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:50:15 -0700

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
>>> Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> writes:
>>>> I'd prefer to back them out.
>>> When I say "back them out", I just mean not include them. I don't care
>>> about the mechanism by which the intended set of changes gets released.
>> Can you turn this into a formal proposal? In terms of the mechanism
>> to do it along with what changes we will not include. Hyrum has
>> already semi-objected to creating new branches and cmpilato did
>> similar on IRC.
>> It seems like there are three that have been backported that we do not
>> want to include in .0. Not sure what else might be in STATUS to
>> include. Maybe just this one?
> I'd be OK with removing these two from the 1.5.x branch and just
> dealing with them for 1.6. Both changes are fine in concept but there
> is likely some followup work needed for r31343 and the other change
> depended on this one. As I had said in issue# 3200 I do not think
> these needed to be exposed to JavaHL this late in the game.

Agreed on backing out the revprops changes to the JavaHL code.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-22 22:50:55 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.