Re: Subversion 1.5 Release decision?

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
> Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> writes:
>> I'd prefer to back them out.
>
> When I say "back them out", I just mean not include them. I don't care
> about the mechanism by which the intended set of changes gets released.

Can you turn this into a formal proposal? In terms of the mechanism
to do it along with what changes we will not include. Hyrum has
already semi-objected to creating new branches and cmpilato did
similar on IRC.

It seems like there are three that have been backported that we do not
want to include in .0. Not sure what else might be in STATUS to
include. Maybe just this one?

 * r31334
   Allow commas and whitespace to delimit revisions in -c arguments.

I'd of course be fine with not including it. I'd assume we could
still include it in .1 since it making the UI more permissive, not
less permissive.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org