[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: performance enhancement by working copy svn server

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:27:35 -0500

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Steinar Bang <sb_at_dod.no> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman_at_red-bean.com>:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:43 PM, John Peacock
>> <john.peacock_at_havurah-software.org> wrote:
>>> Benjamin Smith-Mannschott wrote:
>>>> Yuck. At first blush, this seems to me a pretty unnatural way to work.
>>> Me too.
>> I think hundreds of thousands of perforce users would disagree with
>> you guys. ;-)
> As a counter example, I am a Perforce user who still thinks it's an
> unnatural way to work. I would not like to see this the default
> behaviour of svn.

I think the general consensus is that the default svn behavior will
not change; 'svn edit' will be an optional mode of working, for those
who want or need the speed tradeoff.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-16 16:27:49 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.