Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, 13 May 2008 at 00:00 +0300:
> Karl Fogel wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 at 16:52 -0400:
> > Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.co.il> writes:
> > > Karl, does it pass without David's patch? I only ran file:// checks
> > > here...
> > >
> > > (Normally I run either svnserveautocheck or davautocheck, chosen at
> > > random)
> >
> > Erm, I'm pretty sure it does, because I had run the test suite earlier
> > for some other changes. I'd check right now, but I have another patch
> > in-tree that I'm testing while I review it (Troy Curtis'), so it would
> > be hard to confirm that a pristine tree passes until that's done.
> >
> > -Karl
> >
>
> Thanks. I checked the buildbot now (should have done that before, too),
> and it's my fault (not David's); the neon buildbot fails:
>
...
>
> I assume that the correct fix is to mark test 26 (which requires
> revprop changes to be enabled) as XFail over DAV.
>
Done in r31157; sorry for not fixing that sooner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-13 21:20:31 CEST