[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: log -g problem when performed on files

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:28:14 -0400

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz_at_syntevo.com> wrote:
> When performing log -g on a single file it will return those "Merged via"
> revisions from the merge sources where the file has actually been changed
> (and that's great, btw). However, this seems not to work when the
> svn:mergeinfo property had been committed later than the merge changes
> itself. For example (using RC5):

That is definitely the way it is expected to work. There is no
possibility of changing this. Subversion does not really know if a
commit is the result of a merge, all it can really do is report on
changes to the mergeinfo property. The only place this matters is the
log/blame -g options and they have to assume that the commits where
the mergeinfo property changes were merges.

This is also why you cannot take a pre-1.5 repository, set the correct
mergeinfo properties in HEAD and get working log/blame -g features.
Merge itself will work properly, but the history commands cannot know
which revisions were commits if they do not have the mergeinfo
property modification as part of the commit.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-08 15:28:28 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.