[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RC 5 tomorrow

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 16:25:38 -0500

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
>>> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We've fixed a couple of showstopper bugs and made a few API changes on
>> the
>>>> 1.5.x branch, which necessitates another RC (and a restart of the soak).
>>>> I'd like to roll RC 5 tomorrow (~1900 UTC), so please nominate and vote
>> on
>>>> appropriate changes before then.
>>>>
>>> I do not think we should roll the RC5 without the log-g changes that
>>> cmpilato has done in that branch. I have tested the branch and not
>>> only does it fix virtually all of the problems that have been reported
>>> with log -g it also greatly improves the performance of the command.
>>>
>> Do we have an ETA for Mike's work to land in trunk, and then get nominated
>> for 1.5.x? If doing it by this afternoon (or evening) isn't unreasonable,
>> I'd still like to get RC 5 done in the next 24 hours.
>
> Not sure. I am little worried about the current RC code though and
> how much server resources it might use up. Not to mention that a lot
> of simple cases do not work for some reason as well. So I think it is
> worth getting the improved code in place. I just ran JavaHL tests and
> they passed. Now running the ra_local tests.
>
> Maybe Mike should commit what he has and if he wants to make further
> improvements it can be for 1.5.1? We probably need to hear from him
> on what he thinks is left.

It's been merged to trunk, and nominated for backport to 1.5.x. The
"important to fix" issues in STATUS are:
* r30883: kfogel and reviewing right now.
* r30896 and friends: fix SASL
* Remove exit_code from a test (tests won't pass without this, hence
   it's a blocker.)
* r30931: Potential dataloss bug
* r30963: Not technically a blocker, but a pretty big performance
   booster. Would be nice to have.

Are any other items in STATUS blockers?

Given the plethora of stuff still in STATUS, and the fact that I'm not
going to be around tonight, I can roll the RC tomorrow morning.

-Hyrum

Received on 2008-05-02 23:25:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.