Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> We've fixed a couple of showstopper bugs and made a few API changes on the
>> 1.5.x branch, which necessitates another RC (and a restart of the soak).
>> I'd like to roll RC 5 tomorrow (~1900 UTC), so please nominate and vote on
>> appropriate changes before then.
>
> I do not think we should roll the RC5 without the log-g changes that
> cmpilato has done in that branch. I have tested the branch and not
> only does it fix virtually all of the problems that have been reported
> with log -g it also greatly improves the performance of the command.
Do we have an ETA for Mike's work to land in trunk, and then get
nominated for 1.5.x? If doing it by this afternoon (or evening) isn't
unreasonable, I'd still like to get RC 5 done in the next 24 hours.
> I do not know if any API changes have been backported since RC4, but
> it would be nice to know the bindings are all in good shape still. I
> can report that JavaHL is still okay.
There was an API changes made to svn_ra_open3() in r30838.
If people want to test the bindings as they are present in an RC without
us having to roll an RC, I would recommend looking at the nightlies:
http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/nightly/
-Hyrum
Received on 2008-05-02 17:20:51 CEST