Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, 1 May 2008 at 09:04 +0300:
>> Kristian Kauper wrote on Thu, 1 May 2008 at 09:53 +1000:
>>> Wow, I never expected such a quick resolution. Thanks everyone for helping
>>> with this.
>>>
>>>> Committed r30868 and nominated for backport.
>>> I assume that this means it won't necessarily get into a 1.4.x line,
>> Correct; I nominated it for backport to 1.5.x.
>>
>>> but if it does, will it be part of 1.4.7?
>> If this fix is backported to 1.4 before 1.4.7 is released for testing
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> *If* an 1.4.7 release is made, of course.
Has it been nominated for 1.4.x? It would need to be if it were to be
included in a future 1.4.7 release.
I actually think we should think about doing a final release off the
1.4.x branch after we get 1.5.0 out the door. I suspect a number of
people will be using 1.4 for a while yet, and since we still claim to
support it, it'd be good if we actually followed up on that claim.
-Hyrum
Received on 2008-05-01 19:49:17 CEST