brane_at_tigris.org writes:
> --- trunk/notes/wc-ng-design Thu Apr 24 12:04:37 2008 (r30772)
> +++ trunk/notes/wc-ng-design Thu Apr 24 12:07:54 2008 (r30773)
> @@ -267,6 +267,9 @@ One way to prevent the lengthy 'if()' bl
> to design a dispatch mechanism based on the path-state in WORKING/BASE and the
> required transformation, dispatching to (small) functions which perform
> solely that specific task.
> +#####XBC Do please note that this suggests yet another instance of
> + pure polymorphism coded in C. This runs contrary to the
> + developer sanity requirement.
Are we positive that wc-ng can't introduce C++?
Just trying to keep an open mind. I've virtually no C++ experience
myself, but I'm not necessarily opposed. I do want to make sure we're
not ruling things out-of-bounds thoughtlessly, at least.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-24 21:10:57 CEST