[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why rewrite the Subversion working copy?

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:46:09 +0200

Karl Fogel wrote:
> Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org> writes:
>> Michael Sinz <Michael.Sinz_at_sinz.org> writes:
>>> -- The ability to centralize control/manage client configuration and
>>> behaviors such as the autoprops, security behaviors (saving passwords,
>>> SSL certificate handling, commit note templates, etc)
>> Absolutely. Maybe someone wants to take on repo-based
>> configuration/inheritable props/whatever for 1.6?
> Inheritable props are pretty hard with current libsvn_wc (maybe not
> impossible, just hard). They'll be a lot easier in wc-ng. Hmmm. We
> don't want wc-ng to become a "feature sink", if you know what I mean.
> On the other hand, the idea is to save work...
> Sigh. I should really write up the plan I had a while back for
> implementing them with the current libsvn_wc; klugey, but probably
> workable. Right now I'm pulling a Branko.
> /ducks

What, is my reputation that bad already?

(And would a round of drinks fix it? :-P )

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-24 01:46:34 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.