[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: How to build an expected_status to check against unversioned items?

From: Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:43:43 +0200

Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote on Thu, 17 Apr 2008 at 19:10 +0200:
>> There's a function 'run_and_verify_unquiet_status' that will include the
>> unversioned items in the actual status tree. There's only test that uses it
>> and it's not really a good example.
>> In your case, where the point of the test is to get unversioned items I
>> propose you use this function.
> Should the --keep-local test (basic_tests.py:delete_keep_local()) use
> that function as well?

I think for most cases we can stick to normal status + expected_disk.
There's no real difference between the two methods, the one I proposed
to Rui just does an extra check that 'st -u' on unversioned files is
also working correctly. Once we have a few of those that should cover
all situations.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-22 23:43:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.