[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:10:47 -0400

"Rui, Guo" <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn> writes:
>> I think I do too -- that is, the operational depth becomes the "set"
>> depth for added trees. Would you like to try writing the patch?
> Certainly I would like to. However, it may take me some time to handle
> this, since this will be my first patch on the code. :)

Well, since your Summer of Code project was accepted (congratulations),
this is a good place to start! :-)

We're always here for questions, of course.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-22 17:11:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.