[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Obliterate and auditability

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:38:43 -0400

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>> We will definitely want to support the use case where the revision
>> number itself has to go away. People may not use it very often, but
>> when they want it, they really want it. However, that's also a case
>> where keeping a record might not be necessary anyway!
> [I've not crawled the issue tracker for the arguments supporting this,
> so if the answers lie there, feel free to refer me away.]
> Why, exactly, must we "definitely" support this use-case?

(Sorry for the double noise ... I see the thread continued on to answer this.)

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2008-04-22 09:34:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.