Re: Obliterate and auditability

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>> We will definitely want to support the use case where the revision
>> number itself has to go away. People may not use it very often, but
>> when they want it, they really want it. However, that's also a case
>> where keeping a record might not be necessary anyway!
>
> [I've not crawled the issue tracker for the arguments supporting this,
> so if the answers lie there, feel free to refer me away.]
>
> Why, exactly, must we "definitely" support this use-case?

(Sorry for the double noise ... I see the thread continued on to answer this.)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand