RE: performance enhancement by working copy svn server

> > The whole working copy would have
> > read-only permissions set by default; 'svn edit' would make a file
> > read-write.
>
> Actually, I think this sounds very reasonable (as an option;
> I do respect the need for people to continue working the way
> they always have before). It's a quick & dirty, easy simple
> technique to nearly eliminate the whole problem. No
> architecture dependent (well, minimal) code, which still
> (usually) creates the ability for the svn client to monitor
> all the file edits.
>
> Would this be a feature in 1.5, or after 1.5? Cuz I'd
> definitely have an immediate need for it.

At the site in question, users are seriously questioning if I need to replace svn with perforce, due to performance.

This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error kindly delete this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify us immediately at netadmin_at_patni.com and delete this mail.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-10 21:02:09 CEST